The letter pointed out that the CME’s challenge comes
15 months after the finalization of rules for swap data repositories and ten
months after the adoption of the final swap data recordkeeping and reporting
rules became effective. According to the DTCC, this lengthy delay suggests that
CME’s challenge is prompted not by concerns with the costs of reporting data on
cleared swaps to swap data repositories, but in response to swap
counterparties, those responsible for swap transaction reporting, choosing to
report to swap data repositories other than CME’s captive swap data repository.
A DTCC
subsidiary is provisionally registered to operate a swap data repository
pursuant to CFTC regulations for interest rate, credit, equity.
The DTCC has significant concerns with the potential
negative consequences of a judicial challenge or CFTC action to remove the
necessity for a legal dispute. The Commission cannot undertake changes to its
rules, which have been published for nearly a year, and relied upon for
business planning, without conducting adequate notice, comment, and
consideration of the costs and benefits of amending its rules. The DTCC said
that it is considering its possible responses to the suit and resulting
Commission activity, including possible judicial recourse.
More specifically, the DTCC said that the regulatory
oversight purposes of the Dodd-Frank Act will be frustrated if, through tying
or bundling practices, derivatives clearing organizations unilaterally report
to captive swap data repositories, resulting in fragmented data across multiple
swap data repositories. In rejecting
counterparty reporting instructions, derivatives clearing organizations subvert
the intent of the CFTC’s regulation requiring all swap data for a given swap to
be reported to a single swap data repository. For purposes of market oversight and
prudential Regulation, emphasized the DTCC, it is critical that
swap data is reported to and maintained by one swap data repository throughout the life of the
derivatives contract.