In a partial implementation of the
Sharman Commission recommendations, the U.K. Financial Reporting Council would
require outside auditors of financial statements to consider whether reporting
is fair, balanced and understandable, and to consider and report if they are
aware of any material matter in connection with the disclosure of principal
risks that should be disclosed. The FRC also proposes to remove the current
Corporate Governance Code provision requiring listed companies to make a going
concern statement. The
FRC concluded that the best way to address these issues is to integrate its
current guidance on going concern and risk management and internal control, and
to make some associated revisions to the Corporate Governance Code. A going concern statement is focused on the narrow meaning of
assessing the going concern basis of accounting, reasoned the FRC, and so
detracts from the broader integrated assessment and description of solvency and
liquidity risks envisaged by Lord Sharman.
The draft sets out the duty of directors to set the
company’s risk appetite, ensuring there is an appropriate risk culture
throughout the organization, and assessing and managing the principal risks
facing the company, including risks to its solvency and liquidity. The board
should summarize the process applied in reviewing the effectiveness of the
system of risk management and internal control and explain what actions have
been taken to remedy any significant failings or weaknesses identified from
that review.
In its seminal report on auditors and going concern, the Sharman Commission recommended a process to produce a going concern opinion that envisions a key role for company directors, audit committees and auditors. The panel would also require the going concern assessment process to focus on solvency risks and liquidity risks, as well as identifying risks to the company’s business model or capital adequacy that could threaten its survival. The Sharman Commission wants to move away from a model where the company only highlights going concern risks when there are significant doubts about its survival, to one which integrates the going concern reporting with the directors’ discussion of strategy and principal risks.
In its seminal report on auditors and going concern, the Sharman Commission recommended a process to produce a going concern opinion that envisions a key role for company directors, audit committees and auditors. The panel would also require the going concern assessment process to focus on solvency risks and liquidity risks, as well as identifying risks to the company’s business model or capital adequacy that could threaten its survival. The Sharman Commission wants to move away from a model where the company only highlights going concern risks when there are significant doubts about its survival, to one which integrates the going concern reporting with the directors’ discussion of strategy and principal risks.
A meeting earlier this year of the PCAOB’s Standing
Advisory Group revealed a growing consensus in the SAG that going concern must
focus beyond the traditional liquidity risk to other risks. This dovetails with
the Sharman Panel, which urged the UK oversight authority to ensure that the
going concern guidance for directors reflects the right focus on solvency
risks, not only on liquidity risks, including identifying risks to the
company’s business model or capital adequacy. Similar to the Sharman Panel, SAG members are also concerned about
the current binary nature of the going concern report.
The
Sharman report was initiated by the Financial Reporting Council, the UK counterpart
to the PCAOB. Lord Sharman, Chairman of the Commission, said that, while the
work of the panel emanates from the financial crisis, companies in all sectors
can do more to improve their management and disclosure of risks relating to
going concern, liquidity and solvency. There should also be early
identification and attention to economic and financial distress, he noted. Lord
Sharman was the Liberal Democrat Spokesperson for Trade and Industry/Business
and Regulatory Reform from 2001 to 2010.