The German Corporate Governance Code Commission opposes federal
legislation mandating a binding annual shareholder vote on executive
remuneration. In a statement, Commission Chairman Klaus-Peter Müller expressed doubt
whether a decision made by the shareholders at the annual general meeting will
prevent excessively high management board remuneration. The German Corporate Governance
Code instead places emphasis on greater transparency and an improved basis for
decisions by supervisory boards as a means of putting a stop to excesses in
management board remuneration.
While further regulatory and legislative intervention in setting
management remuneration may satisfy certain expectations in some quarters of
society, noted the Chairman, it would place fetters on global companies. More
broadly, Chairman Müller appealed to policy-makers to trust in the self-regulating
force of the German Corporate Governance Code, adding that it is neither
necessary nor desirable for every aspect of business life to be governed by
binding legislation.
German companies
operate under a two-tier system of corporate governance with a supervisory
board with oversight power and a management board that daily runs the company. The aim of
the German Corporate Governance Code is to make Germany 's corporate governance
rules transparent for both national and international investors, thus
strengthening confidence in the management of German corporations. The
German Corporate Governance Code is on a comply or explain basis under which public
companies are required to declare annually whether or not they have complied
with the recommendations of the Code.
Chairman Müller also voiced his objection to any attempt to adopt
a global, or even an E.U., corporate governance code. Like legislation, he
noted, a corporate governance code must take account of specific national
factors. As it is, the differences in corporate governance across Europe shows that a European Code would not work, he
opined.
That said, however, he emphasized that the Commission still has a
goal of developing as much common ground as possible when it comes to good
corporate governance. It must be made easier for global companies to meet the
requirements expected of them with respect to good corporate governance. The
discussion on board remuneration highlights the need for a greater consensus on
what this constitutes. Currently, said the Chairman, there is no sufficient underlying
international or European consensus on such issues.
He reasoned that, even if Germany were to enact the strictest
remuneration legislation,
this would not have the slightest impact on salaries paid on Wall
Street or in Silicon Valley or London .
If greater restrictions were applied in Germany to management board
remuneration compared with other countries, he cautioned, this would result in
competitive distortion and the risk of the best minds, notably those with an
international background, leaving the country.