The legislation also requires the SEC Chair and other
agency heads to conduct a review of proposed significant rulemaking and submit
the results of that review to the appropriate congressional oversight
committees which, in the SEC's case would be the Senate Banking Committee and
the House Financial Services Committee. The review must also be posted on a
public website. The review must examine, among other things, the problem the
proposed regulation is intended to address and the impact of the regulation on
the ability of new businesses to form and expand. The review must also identify
and conflicting or duplicative regulations.
Commentary and musings on the complex, fascinating and peculiar world that is securities regulation
Thursday, February 28, 2013
Senator Warner Introduces Bi-Partisan Legislation Requiring SEC and Other Independent Federal Agenies to Conduct Cost Benefit Analysis of Regulations
Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), a key member of the Banking
Committee, and Senator Jerry Moran (R-KN) have introduced legislation requiring
the SEC and other independent federal agenies to conduct a cost-benefit
analysis of significant regulations. which the Startup Act 3.0, S. 310,
defines, in the alternative, a regulation with a $100 million impact on the
economy or a regulation that materially adversely impacts a sector of the
economy, jobs or competition, or a regulation that creates a serious
inconsistency or otherwise interferes with an action by another agency. Under
the bill, the SEC and other independent regulators would have to conduct a
cost-benefit analysis that includes an assessment of the benefits perceived
from the propopsed regulation and an assessment of the costs of the proposed
regulation, including the costs to the federal government to administer the
regulation and the cost of companies to comply with it. There must also be an
assessment of the cost and benefits of any reasonably feasible alternatives to the proposed
regulation and why the proposed regulation is preferable to these alternatives.