PCAOB outreach to audit committees is an important
component, emphasized Chairman Doty, adding that outreach to and interaction
with audit committees is one of the Board’s near-term priorities. He believes
that outreach and interaction should help audit committees promote audit
quality.
Audit committees have a role in fostering not just integrity
in management's reporting, emphasized the Chair, but the vitality and viability
of the independent audit. In his experience, when an audit committee meets with
internal audit or compliance staff, the first question they ask is, "do
you have enough resources?" This is a question that all audit committees
should also ask of the external auditor, he said, and the good ones do. The audit is the
linchpin of the investing public's confidence in the company; he emphasized,
not something to be procured from the lowest cost supplier.
With regard to the Board’s standard setting, the Chair said
that auditing standards should reflect a contemporary review of the challenges
that auditors face, which the Board can see through its inspections. At the
same time, the standards must be sufficiently clear and concrete to be
enforceable fairly, for enforcing them is an important element of what the
Board does.
The Board should also take good ideas from wherever else
they come. For example, the International Auditing and Assurance Standards
Board is moving forward with its paper on using the auditor's reporting model
to communicate useful information from the audit to investors. PCAOB staff and
Board members have had numerous discussions with the IAASB, noted Chairman
Doty, and the PCAOB’s project on the Auditor's Reporting Model has benefitted
greatly from this interaction. But he added that there is no presumption for
simply adopting, off-the-shelf, other standards-setters' work in order to trade
out an interim standard expeditiously.
Above all, emphasis should be placed on identifying and
reacting appropriately to risk, and on establishing counterweights to
circumstances that could detract from the ultimate goal of obtaining a high
level of assurance that the financial statements are free of material
misstatement. This is why he believes that it is so important to reexamine how
the Board protects the auditor's independence, including by considering term
limits.
Finally, Chairman Doty noted that economic analysis can help
in the review of the PCAOB's standards-setting framework by prompting critical
questions, such as what is the problem and what are the alternatives, both to
rulemaking and by rulemaking. More broadly, the analysis should ask what is the
most cost-effective solution for society.
Indeed, continued the Chair, economic analysis may tell the
Board that if audit quality can be improved through certain kinds of structural
changes, such as by enhancing independence, introducing more transparency, or
infusing the audit report with more insight, turning the auditor's focus more
squarely toward communication with the investing public, the Board may be able
to avoid the incremental cost of requiring additional audit procedures.
Economic analysis may also help the audit profession
overcome market obstacles and realign incentives to promote sustainable
excellence. Chairman Doty would like to see the audit profession compete on
quality more than price. Audit standards that give audit committees and the
public tools to distinguish on the basis of quality may help the audit
profession get there.