The Senators also
ask if U.S. officials
considered the litigation risks to U.S.
borrowers in deciding to bring the LIBOR scandal only to the attention of
British central banks rather than U.S. lenders and borrowers and
whether the Treasury Department’s continued reliance on LIBOR is affecting
borrower access to Small Business Administration loans. The Secretary’s
response to the questions is requested by October 16.
The London interbank offered
rate, or LIBOR, is the average interest rate that banks use to borrow from each
other. Set in London ,
the rate is one of the main rates that determine the cost of interest for
trillions of dollars of loans on a variety of everyday consumer loans such as
mortgages and more complicated financial instruments such as derivatives.
Senators Grassley
and Kirk emphasized that, in the wake of the LIBOR scandal, it is essential to
undertake steps to consider the creation of a US-based interest rate index. If U.S. investors and borrowers have suffered
financial harm from dependence on an index set in London , they have the right to expect the
country’s leaders to support better alternatives. Complacency in the wake of
losses and lawsuits will diminish both investor and borrower confidence
regarding debt securities issued in U.S. financial markets, said the
Senators.
Taxpayers need to
know that the Treasury Department is making sure that the interest rates they
pay on everything from home loans to retirement investments are not rigged,
said Senator Grassley. Treasury must take swift action to inform consumers,
homeowners, students and other borrowers about potential impacts of faulty
interest rates, added Senator Kirk, a member of the Senate Banking Committee.
The financial system depends on this crucial information, he posited, and Treasury
should consider alternative solutions to boost confidence in the marketplace.”
In the letter, the Senators noted that, in recent testimony before Congress, Secretary Geithner said that when, as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, he became aware of concerns that the LIBOR rate was being rigged, he deferred to the British central bankers to fix the problem. Despite those concerns, continued the Senators, Mr. Geithner appears not to have taken action to diminish use of this flawed index inU.S. financial markets; to the
contrary, Treasury’s use of LIBOR has increased.
In the letter, the Senators noted that, in recent testimony before Congress, Secretary Geithner said that when, as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, he became aware of concerns that the LIBOR rate was being rigged, he deferred to the British central bankers to fix the problem. Despite those concerns, continued the Senators, Mr. Geithner appears not to have taken action to diminish use of this flawed index in
Recently, a Task
Force headed by Martin Wheatley, UK Financial Services Authority Managing
Director, recommended three specific regulatory reforms to restore credibility
to LIBOR. First, regulation of LIBOR by the FSA. Second, the key persons in the
LIBOR process should be approved by the FSA. Third, amending the Financial
Services and Markets Act to allow the FSA to prosecute the manipulation of
LIBOR.