The law says that no aid can be extended to deal
with the consequences of a failure of any large financial institution until the
institution is put out of business, said Rep. Frank, and any money expended in
the course of liquidating such an institution will be recovered first from the
failed institution’s assets, and if those are insufficient, then from the
financial industry via an assessment on financial institutions with $50 billion
in assets or more.
No funds from the Treasury can be expended in this
process without an automatic 100% recovery. This came via the Boxer Amendment,
which clarified that no financial firm will be kept alive with taxpayer money.
If a financial firm needs to be liquidated, the costs of liquidation will be
recovered from the disposition of the company’s assets or will be the
responsibility of the financial sector through assessments. (See remarks of
Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA), Cong. Record, May 4, 2010, S3063). According to
Senator Mark Warner (D-VA), the Boxer Amendment reaffirms that entry into the
resolution authority will mean that the financial firm will go out of business
and that this will be an effective death panel for a financial institution. (Cong.
Record, May 3, 2010, S3027)
Senator Christopher Dodd (D-CT) said that the
Title II liquidation authority will wind down failing financial firms,
eliminate shareholder interests, cause culpable management to be fired, impose
losses on creditors and require the clawback of any payment to creditors above
liquidation value. (House-Senate Conference Committee Meeting of June 17,
2010). Senator Warner said that he did not want to hear the words ``too big to
fail’’ ever again, adding that Dodd-Frank creates appropriate tools through the
orderly liquidation authority to unwind failing firms and put them out of
business at the expense of the financial industry not the taxpayers. (Press
Release of Senator Mark Warner, June 21, 2010).
To be fair to Governor Romney, there is a
perception among some that, despite the liquidation authority of Dodd-Frank,
the federal government would not allow a large US global financial institution to
fail. In 2011 testimony before a House Oversight Committee, at that time TARP
Special Inspector General Neil Barofsky said that there is still a public
perception, reinforced by global credit agencies, that these institutions are
still too big to fail. Dodd-Frank was intended to end too big to fail,
acknowledged SIGTARP, and the Title II liquidation authority does wind down a
failed financial institution, but there is still a market perception that these
large firms will simply not be permitted to fail. (Testimony of SIGTARP Neil
Barofsky, March 30, 2011, House TARP Oversight Subcommittee).