As
an investor protection, the Chair supports the banning of inducements provided
to investment advisers, which he views as an important factor leading to
unsuitable products being recommended to clients. The problem cannot be solved by more
transparency alone, he emphasized, and the disclosure of inducements is simply
not sufficient.
At a minimum, regulators must ban inducements in the case of discretionary
portfolio management and when an adviser wants to use the independent label. In
his view, banning inducements will contribute to achieving a viable business
model with a high level of investor trust.
In
addition, in response to the retailization of complex financial products which
increases the risk that retail investors do not understand the risks attached
to their investments, ESMA will propose the improvement of implementation
standards of those provisions of the MiFID Directive involving information to
clients, suitability and appropriateness. In the ESMA Chair’s view, reinforcing
MiFID conduct rules as financial instruments grow in complexity and internet use
increases will enhance investor protection.
In
this regard, Chairman Maijoor said that ESMA will remind both regulators and
financial firms about selling practices for complex products, including, for example,
the sale of structured products to retail investors, and platforms giving
access to complex products. ERSMA is currently developing an investor
communication explaining the risks of investing in complex products and
structured products. This will be a complement to the investor warning ESMA
issued last month regarding the pitfalls facing investors when using the Internet
for investment purposes.
On
the distribution of complex products, ESMA is continuing to map the various
national initiatives to get a better understanding of the rationale for those
initiatives, and to identify existing problems and issues. The aim is to
consider what ESMA could do at the European level to improve investor
protection in relation to the distribution of complex structured products by
establishing common ground where possible for distribution frameworks of
complex structured products across the EU.
In
addition to issuing final guidelines on the remuneration of hedge fund managers
under the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive, ESMA is negotiating
co-operation agreements with the US and other non-EU authorities,
which have to be in place by July 2013.
ESMA is leading the negotiations on behalf of the EU competent
authorities, said the Chairman, which makes sense both in terms of efficiency
and in helping achieve a consistent result across jurisdictions. A common text has been agreed on the EU side
and ESMA is now negotiating with its US and non-EU counterparts on the
basis of that text. ESMA is fully aware
of the importance of having the agreements in place in a timely manner and will
look to make progress as quickly as possible, while bearing in mind the need to
have robust arrangements that deliver what is required by the AIFMD.