Libor is a benchmark used to gauge the cost of unsecured borrowing in the
A consultation was
published August 10, 2012 under a very tight time frame. The comment period
ends on September 7. After the review, Director Wheatley will make
recommendations by the end of the summer to the UK Government, which will then
make a decision and implement any changes in the Financial Services Bill or the
Banking Reform Bill.
The Government will also
be engaging with a wide range of international regulators as part of the reform
process, including IOSCO, the SEC, CFTC and US Treasury. Mark Hoban ,
UK Financial Secretary said
that the UK
will work with international partners to ensure a globally consistent solution.
As part of the review, the
Managing Director will look at how Libor can be reformed, including whether
actual trade data can be used to set the reference rate, the governance of
Libor, and whether the setting of Libor should be brought into statutory
regulation. The process of how Libor is compiled will have to be reformed by
minimizing judgment in Libor submissions and using better transaction-based
data. There would also have to be a standard procedure to corroborate
individual submissions.
While basing the rate on
actual money market transaction data could help with subjectivity and
corroboration issues, noted the FSA official, a concern would be the low volume
of transactions in particular currencies. One solution could be coupling the
use of actual transaction data with a broadened definition of relevant funding
to include other products such as commercial paper.
Improvements might also
be made through a reduction of the less-used maturities and currencies that are
quoted. The FSA official suggested a hybrid of transaction data and a
hypothetical rate, using judgment to fill in the gaps when data is scarce, all
within a specified framework. But this comes back around to the use of
judgment, said Mr. Wheatley, and so some kind of trade reporting mechanism may
also be needed to supplement it.
A new Libor governance
framework must ensure that the compilation process is subject to a much greater
degree of independence, transparency and accountability
The Managing Director
will also look into replacing Libor with other benchmarks. He cautioned that a
migration to a new benchmark would require a carefully planned and managed
transition in order to limit disruption to the huge volume of outstanding
contracts that reference Libor. In addition, a decision to migrate to an
alternative benchmark should be considered at an international level by
relevant authorities.
An alternative benchmark
would have to satisfy certain standards. For example, it should have a maturity
curve to allow flexible use of the rate in different contracts and the hedging
of different interest rate exposures. Also, an alternative benchmark should
have sufficient transaction volume to establish a rate, noted the consultation,
and the provided rates should be resilient through periods of illiquidity.
Ultimately, the choice of benchmarks for financial contracts
is largely market-driven. If market participants decide that alternatives to
LIBOR are more appropriate, they will move towards using these alternatives.
This said, migration to an alternative benchmark might be hindered by market
inertia regarding the adoption of a new global benchmark. However, decisions
taken by regulators will influence the choices made by the market. If
regulators reform LIBOR so that problematic issues are dealt with, markets
might well take this action as an implicit approval to continue using Libor.
Given the importance of regulators in guiding market behavior
on benchmark usage, as well as the need for a carefully managed transition if
an alternative to Libor is used, the UK Government urged either IOSCO or the
Financial Stability Board to take a
proactive role in coordinating the approach to the use of benchmarks in
financial markets.